The evolution of the american law institute test for insanity in Oregon: focus on diagnosis.
نویسندگان
چکیده
In 1962, the American Law Institute published its Model Penal Code, which includes an insanity test later adopted by many states. The second paragraph of the test excludes people with certain psychiatric conditions manifested by repeated criminal or antisocial conduct from using them as a basis for an insanity defense. Oregon adopted this test in 1971. Since then, its legislature and courts have added to the conditions excluded in the second paragraph. In this article, we look at how recent Oregon appellate court decisions have culminated in a narrower and less contentious notion of which psychiatric diagnoses serve as a basis for an insanity defense. Then we discuss Oregon's expansion of the second paragraph of the American Law Institute Insanity Test in a national context.
منابع مشابه
Oregon's new insanity defense system: a review of the first five years, 1978 to 1982.
On January I, 1978 Oregon instituted an insanity defense system that is unique in the country. The central feature of that system is the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB). The system was experimental; the statute provided that the PSRB was to cease operation in 3 I h years unless the 1981 legislature renewed its existence. Before and during the 1981 session the Oregon legislature conduct...
متن کاملPost-Hinckley insanity reform in Oregon.
The 1983 Oregon legislature responded to public pressure to narrow the application of the insanity defense by eliminating personality disordered individuals from consideration for an insanity verdict. This article examined the effects of the statutory change, and found no significant change in the frequency of insanity acquittals of personality disordered subjects between the three pre-reform y...
متن کاملمفهوم جنون در قانون مجازات اسلامی؛ موضوعیت یا طریقیت
Subjectivism or Objectivism of insanity, as one of the eliminators of criminal responsibility, are challenges under attention regarding the psychotherapy findings about the criminal responsibility of the lunatics. The difference between the two is that if insanity has subjectivism to eliminate criminal responsibility, its authentication by judicial authority leads to eliminate the criminal resp...
متن کاملShared psychotic disorder and criminal responsibility: a review and case report of folie à trois.
We present a case of shared psychotic disorder involving three sisters who were successful in establishing an insanity defense on numerous felony charges in the South Carolina criminal court system. Two of the authors of this article were court-appointed examiners in this case. We then present a history of shared psychotic disorder, an overview of the use of this diagnosis in the defense of ins...
متن کاملDisposition of insanity defense cases in Oregon.
Introduction The defense of insanity has been a source of debate since its inception. In theory, this defense is a natural result of the requirement basic to the criminal law that, to find guilt, there must be a guilty mind. 1 In practice, implementation of this concept through the insanity defense has led to many complex problems. The result is a continuing controversy within and between the l...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
دوره 35 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007